Search Results
Basic life support trained nurses ventilate more efficiently with laryngeal mask supreme than with facemask or laryngeal tube suction-disposable – A prospective, randomized clinical trial
Authors:
Gruber E. et al.
Publication:
Resuscitation 2014; 85 (4): 499–502.
Summary:
- A study to compare aspects of airway management and ventilation with the LMA Supreme™, the laryngeal tube suction-disposable and facemask ventilation when placed by nurses who had received only minimal training in their use
Supraglottic airways in difficult airway management: successes, failures, use and misuse
Authors:
Timmermann A.
Publication:
Anaesthesia 2011; 66 (Suppl. 2): 45-56.
Summary:
- A review of the literature looking into the successes, failures, use and misuse of supraglottic airways in difficult airway management
- Supraglottic airway devices have an important role to play in the management of patients with difficult airways
The influence of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) cuff pressure on postoperative sore throat
Authors:
Spiro M. et al.
Publication:
Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27 (47): 250 [Abstract 19AP3-1].
Summary:
- A study to investigate whether over inflation of the cuff contributes to post-operative sore throat in recipients of the Fannin integral single-use laryngeal mask
Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel™ in comparison with the laryngeal mask airway Classic™ and ProSeal™ using a cadaver model
Authors:
Schmidbauer W. et al.
Publication:
Br J Anaesth 2009; 102 (1): 135-139.
Summary:
- A study to compare the oesophageal seal of the LMA Classic™, LMA ProSeal™ and i-gel™ supraglottic airway devices in human cadavers
- The LMA Classic™ and LMA ProSeal™ devices withstood a significantly higher oesophageal pressure than the i-gel™ in cadaver models
Magnetic resonance imaging study of the in vivo position of the extraglottic airway devices i-gel™ and LMA-Supreme™ in anaesthetized human volunteers
Authors:
Russo S.G. et al.
Publication:
Br J Anaesth 2012; 109 (6): 996-1004.
Summary:
- A study to compare the in situ position of the LMA Supreme™ and the i-gel™ supraglottic airway devices in anaesthetised volunteers
- The LMA Supreme™ protruded deeper into the upper oesophageal sphincter than the i-gel™, relative to both the glottis and to the spine
Lingual nerve injury following the use of an i-gel™ laryngeal mask
Authors:
Renes S.H. et al.
Publication:
Anaesthesia 2011; 66 (3): 226-227.
Summary:
- A case of bilateral lingual nerve damage following the use of the i-gel™ supraglottic airway device was reported in a 69-year-old male who had undergone open inguinal herniorrhaphy under general anaesthesia
Sore throat and supraglottic airways: Size matters!
Authors:
Gross J. et al.
Publication:
Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27 (47): 245-246 [Abstract 19AP1-5].
Summary:
- A study to investigate whether incorrectly sized supraglottic airway devices are associated with an increase in the incidence of sore throat in the post-operative period
Comparison of guided insertion of the LMA ProSeal™ vs the i-gel™
Authors:
Gasteiger L. et al.
Publication:
Anaesthesia 2010; 65 (9): 913-916.
Summary:
- A study to compare the performances of the LMA ProSeal™ and the i-gel™ supraglottic airway devices in anaesthetised female patients undergoing elective gynaecological or orthopaedic surgery in the supine position
LMA Supreme™, i-gel™ and Laryngeal Tube Suction™ – A prospective, randomized comparative evaluation using fiberoptic and color indicator assessment techniques
Authors:
Cremer S. et al.
Publication:
Poster presentation at the 14th Annual Society for Airway Management Scientific Meeting, 24-26 September 2010, Chicago, IL, USA.
Summary:
- A study to compare the performances of the LMA Supreme™, i-gel™ and Laryngeal Tube Suction™ supraglottic airway devices in patients undergoing minor surgery
Supraglottic airway devices: recent advances
Authors:
Cook T., Howes B.
Publication:
Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain 2011; 11 (2): 56-61.
Summary:
- A review of the recent advances in supraglottic airway devices
- Although the LMA ProSeal™ has not been shown to outperform the LMA Classic™, its efficacy and safety has been demonstrated in routine and advanced use